there's no difference. whether you choose to be homosexual or heterosexual, it's all the same: you choose to limit yourself in liking "just men" or "just women". -and, yes, it is a choice, and, no, it isn't something you are born with. humans are not born with a spirit. they acquire it unknowingly. and then become aware of the acquisition. that's kabbalah one-o-one.- being gay or being straight are, both, forms of limitation.

the choice of limitation isn't the only thing that makes the self called hetero/homo -sexual being inferior. oh no. their pathetic status of voluntary self-restriction deepens in its absurdness because nowadays there are no just men or just women. the trend today is of abolishing gender boundaries when attempting to classify people. you see them on the streets, in your neighborhood, on the corner, at the emomart, you see them on myspace, youtube, hi5, at indie rock concerts, you see them in your mirror and you can't help but wonder whether the one you see is either punk or metal, either a simple headbanger or a true and through anarchist-in-the-UK, whether he's an old school dignified goth or a bad imitation of a goth, an emo, whether he's a batcaver, biker, bike geek, bohemian, cyber, chav, deadhead, dude, dudette, gamer, gangster, gangsta, geek, grunger, hacker, hardliner, hip-hopper, hippie, hipster, idiot, japanophile-anime freak enthusiast, jocker, juggalo, juggallette, metalhead,mod, nazi skinhead, nerd,new romantic, new-waver, preppy, psychobilly, raver, redneck, redskin, rivethead, rocker, rockabilly, scene kid, surfer, skater, skinhead, straightedge, stoner, teenybopper, wigger, etc. whichever the case, the youngsters nowadays wear uniforms that distinguish them only as members of different subcultures not as members of different genders. they are the new modern human. the androgynous one. you're choice of limitation is, thus, as unnatural and against the trend as it can get.

even if we didn't resort to petty classifications, you, the just man or just woman, are the inferior human. why? because the mind has always been general and genderless, making, thus, the male or female mentality a senseless notion/concept or a stereotype. and, you see, the stereotype is inferior to the concept. the inferior man is the one who ignores the world of the mind and it's product -the concept-, the one who is unable to dream, the one who, in his cowardice and lack of spine, decides to give up the spiritual world, because of the pain the contradiction causes him. the contradiction between the gendered body and the genderless mind. so he gives up the one thing that is easiest to give up. the one he is less familiar with. the one acquired later on. the mind. the spirit. the concept. yet one can never free oneself of one's spirit. because the spirit never gives up on man. that's why the inferior man preserves the tendency of generalizing, yet his act of generalizing becomes a failed one, and the product of his generalization is the failed concept, the stereotype. the inferior man is, thus, only able to create stereotypes, while the superior human, the androgynous one, the one who, on becoming aware of the spiritual world, falls in love with it and never wishes to part from it, creates concepts. the superior human is a being of the mind, one who acknowledges the sufferance caused by the genderless mind trapped within a gendered body, and bares with it to self transcendency or damnation, to its ascent or suicide.

what is a man? what is a woman? how should a man or woman act? how should a straight/gay man or woman act? these questions can only be answered in a stereotyped form. because "man" and "woman", "gay" and "straight" are themselves stereotypes. and thinking that you, as "just a man" or "just a woman", are only able to like "just men" or "just women" is a failed kind of thinking. it's not really thinking. it's creating more and more stereotypes. and deepening yourself more and more into your inferior status. because there are no men and there are no women, there are only humans. or if there still are men and women in the world, gays and straights, I, a as a superior human, as an Ubermensch, choose to ignore anything that is product of the inferior man and his/her existence and look only upon those who are my equals.

---------------------------
Further reading:

<sub>5-part BBC documentary about david bowie - the inventor of the androgynous persona within glam rock and creator of ziggy stardust - the archetype of the modern artist on the verge of damnation [see related quotes here]

bauhaus - ziggy stardust. one of the godfathers of goth, bauhaus, emulating david bowie's ziggy stardust persona 10 years later ('82).

specimen - kiss kiss bang bang. what followed bauhaus and the late 70s early - 80s post-punk movement: the batcave and its glam horror-punk goth influences/appearance.

i must be emo - song with emphasis on 0:44, 2:12 and 2:37. meditation guidelines: why is emo truly "one step below transvestite"? why is an emo boy only half right about his statement at 2:12? and especially meditate on: why don't parents get emos? also watch the mock documentary here for a deeper understanding on the emo subculture.

Contemporary artists and their ideologies regarding the matter

Julian Barratt and Tim Hope's band, the pod, and their half-serious/half-sarcastic lyrics/themes in general. the first link contains bits of their genderless and uber techno menschen videos.

Noel Fielding, interviewed by charlotte church wherein he explains his glam androgynous self/persona. and here's his appearance in never mind the buzz cocks. (see for spooning)

Julian Barrat and Noel Fielding's long history of collaborations (out of which i'll only quote the ones obviously-in-your-face kind of relevant to the subject): Sweet (short film) and their Mighty Boosh series' relevant video no1, relevant video no2 , and here's a bit of a tv interview where they're talking about tatu and how they'll probably emulate the girls.

a bit of Russell Brand's after drug persona. this is the "real" russell brand, and here's what russell was up to while in his drug period.

Russel Brand and Noel Fielding collaborating: Big Fat Quiz Of The Year 2006 where they were teemed up together and where they got the idea with the whole goth detectives thing.

Robots in Disguise. the girls appear in the mighty boosh as well (seeing as dee plume is noel fielding's long term girlfriend), but the relevant thing in this video is that someone on the youtube page actually asks whether they're guys at which someone else replies "No, English women often look like interesting men, and English men often look like interesting women. They've been on that island for a long, long time.". their interview is somewhat relevant with what sue denim says at 5:02 (actually, they both pick up on the new "genderless trend". dee agrees with sue at about 5:12), and also the "trend" is "revealed" by a certain kind of fan videos such as the following: this and this.

and these are just the artists i'm currently researching.</sub>